Selection of peripheral intravenous catheters with 24-gauge side-holes versus those with 22-gauge end-hole for MDCT

Selection of peripheral intravenous catheters with 24-gauge side-holes versus those with 22-gauge end-hole for MDCT - IV contrast infusion via 24-gauge side-holes catheter

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000023727

Enrollment

180

Registered

2016-08-23

Start date

2014-11-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

All the patients who were referred for a suspect of pancreatic disease are eligible.

Interventions

Dynamic CT with the 24-gauge side-holes catheter. Dynamic CT with the 22-gauge end-hole catheter.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients were randomized if they weighted more than 30 kg, if they were outpatients, and if aged 20 years old or older.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria were contraindications to iodinated contrast media, emergency cases, hemodialysis or renal failure patients, pregnant or lactating women, cases unable to place intravenous catheters, and cases with right median cubital vein puncture as an alternative route.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The safety during intravenous contrast material administration.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The injection pressure and the contrast enhancement.	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactAkio Tamura

Iwate Medical University School of Medicine Department of Radiology

a.akahane@gmail.com0196515111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026