Skip to content

C-MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

C-MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis - C-MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000023694
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2017-05-01
Start date
2016-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients of tracheal intubation

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Saitama Medical University Hospital,
Lead Sponsor
Teikyo University School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare,Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Allegheny Health Network
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: General anesthesia, Tracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pediatric

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assessed by intubation success rate, intubation time, glottis visualisation and number of external laryngeal manipulation.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHoshijima Hiroshi

Saitama Medical University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology

hhoshi@saitama-med.ac.jp049-276-1271

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026