JPICS '15:Japanese Post-operative infectious complication surveillance in 2015

JPICS '15:Japanese Post-operative infectious complication surveillance in 2015 - JPICS '15

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000022220

Enrollment

500

Registered

2017-05-31

Start date

2015-09-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

perioperative infection

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The case of perioperative infection after digestive surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The digestive operative case not to be equal to criteria for selection

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The payment of medical expenses, a permitted medical act and nation feelings are greatly different from the United States for Japanese medical care. Therefore the medical quality and security cannot be compared simply between United States and Japanese. The tolerance of Japanese cure level is wide, because the Japanese GPC system attaches great importance to maintaining medical quality and security. As for the perioperative infection, the surveillance was carried out only for surgical site infection, but the remote infection, for example respiratory infection, catheter infection, urinary tract infection and antimicrobials-related enteritis, is extremely important on the prognosis of the operation patient, the appearance prevention of resistant bacteria, and one of medical expenses. This surveillance is intended that we maintain Japanese expensive infection measures and that we achieve a higher aim.	—

Measure

Time frame

The payment of medical expenses, a permitted medical act and nation feelings are greatly different from the United States for Japanese medical care. Therefore the medical quality and security cannot be compared simply between United States and Japanese. The tolerance of Japanese cure level is wide, because the Japanese GPC system attaches great importance to maintaining medical quality and security. As for the perioperative infection, the surveillance was carried out only for surgical site infection, but the remote infection, for example respiratory infection, catheter infection, urinary tract infection and antimicrobials-related enteritis, is extremely important on the prognosis of the operation patient, the appearance prevention of resistant bacteria, and one of medical expenses. This surveillance is intended that we maintain Japanese expensive infection measures and that we achieve a higher aim.

—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactToru Niitsuma, Shinya Kusachi

Toho University Ohashi Medical Center Department of Surgery

toru.niitsuma@gmail.com03-3468-1251

Outcome results