Which monitor is superior to detect apnea of a healthy adult volunteer between using respiratory sound and plethysmography?

Which monitor is superior to detect apnea of a healthy adult volunteer between using respiratory sound and plethysmography? - Which monitor is superior to detect apnea?

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000021631

Enrollment

Registered

2016-04-01

Start date

2016-04-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

healthy adult volunteers

Interventions

The volunteers are applied sensors of Masimo New Radical-7 and Nellcor PM1000N. They breathe at the rate of 12/min by the metronome for 3 min and then they stop breathing for 15-30 sec. If apnea is de

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy adult volunteer.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A subject shows respiratory symptom at research time.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time until detecting apnea by either the monitor after the volunteer stop regular breathing.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Respiratory rate(RR) during regular breathing Time until showing RR and diminished alarm of the monitor Change of oxygen saturation by apnea	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTomoko Fukuda

Tokyo Women's Medical University, School of medicine Department of Anesthesiology

tfukada@anes.twmu.ac.jp03-3353-8111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026