Skip to content

Implant stability change for one-year postoperative stage after simultaneous implant placement with sinus graft for maxillary posterior region: Randomized clinical comparative study of PRF versus Bio-Oss

Implant stability change for one-year postoperative stage after simultaneous implant placement with sinus graft for maxillary posterior region: Randomized clinical comparative study of PRF versus Bio-Oss - Implant stability change for one-year postoperative stage after simultaneous implant placement with sinus graft for maxillary posterior region: Randomized clinical comparative study of PRF versus Bio-Oss

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000021342
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-03-08
Start date
2013-09-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Missing tooth

Interventions

Subjects used PRP at simultaneous implant placement with sinus graft Subjects used Bio-Oss at simultaneous implant placement with sinus graft

Sponsors

Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University
Lead Sponsor
Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) aged 20 years or older and had consented to participate in this study, (2) a missing tooth or teeth in the maxillary posterior region (first premolar to second molar), (3) require bone augmentation during implant placement, (4) adherence to the follow-up visits as scheduled, (5) Plaque Control Record of <25% in terms of O'Leary score during examination, (6) existing residual bone height being more than 4 mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) having systemic or psychiatric disease that could affect implant treatment, (2) contradiction to oral surgical procedures, (3) participants to other clinical trials, (4) heavy bruxers or having clenching habit, (5) already undergone bone augmentation in the implant site, (6) having an untreated tooth or teeth requiring endodontic treatment adjacent to the implant placement site, (7) having teeth with 4 mm or deeper periodontal pockets, (8) smoking 10 or more cigarettes per day or were unable to quit smoking for the two weeks before and after implant placement, (9) pregnant or breastfeeding, (10) considered unsuitable to participate in the study by their physician-in-charge, (11) having an experience of the failure of implant placement at the concerned site, (12) undergone tooth extraction within the past 12 weeks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
implant stability quotient (ISQ) at implant placement, 1 week, 2 week, 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYoshihiro Tsukiyama

Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University Section of Implant and Rehabilitative Dentistry, Division of Oral Rehabilitation

tsuki@dent.kyushu-u.ac.jp092-642-6441

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026