Healthy volunteer
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1) healthy male volunteers 2) performance status (grade0) 3) 20-40 years old 4) right handed
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1) diabetus melitus 2) allergic reactions 3) cognitive impairment(MMSE<27) 4) those who have felt unconfortable after blood sampling or injections 5) those who have sensitivity to alcohol in their skin upon sterilization
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| In this study, images of FDG PEM and FDG PET are compared using a socring system. Spatial resolution of PEM is better than that of whole body PET. If the PEM scanner can visualize the skeletal muscle activity better than a whole body PET, PEM might be able to apply for orthopediac disordrs in hands and forearms. In this study, similar evaluation is to be done also for brain images. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| In addition, standardized uptake value (SUV) is also used as the secondary outcome. | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Cyclotron and Radioisotope Center, Tohoku Univeristy Div. of Cyclotron Nuclear Medicine