Skip to content

An investigation of antitumor effectiveness using M-VAC/CaG prediction system in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

An investigation of antitumor effectiveness using M-VAC/CaG prediction system in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. - An investigation of antitumor effectiveness using M-VAC/CaG prediction system in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000019902
Enrollment
35
Registered
2015-11-23
Start date
2011-03-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Interventions

Based on the results of the prediction score and patient&#39
s wishes the patients were allocated into four treatments
neoadjuvant M-VAC, neoadjuvant CaG, operation or radiation therapy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Sponsors

Department of Urology, Iwate Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Samples had been confirmed histologically as urothelial carcinoma of the bladder are selected for this study. No node metastasis through computed tomography from their chest to pelvis and magnetic resonance imaging of their abdomen and pelvis at clinical stages T2aN0M0 to T4aN0M0 (Stage II-III) and were expected to undergo radical cystectomy without prior radiation therapy. No serious abnormality in renal, hepatic or hematologic function and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) judged to be <=2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) The case with serious complications 2) The case with active double cancer 3) The case with pregnancy, lactation or possibility of pregnancy 4) The case with drug allergy for G-CSF 5) The case with drug allergy for M-VAC or CaG 6) The case without the selection criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoints of this study are accuracy and efficacy of prediction systems, proportion of achieving significant tumor shrinking (>60%) by either or both of the two regimens with intention-to-treat compared with that of historical controls.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary endpoint is the overall survival between the patients of this prospective study and the historical controls.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYoichiro Kato

Iwate Medical University Urology

j2c789@bma.biglobe.ne.jp0196515111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026