A randomized comparison of elective transradial coronary intervention using 6.5-Fr Sheathless Eaucathe guide catheter vs. 6.0-Fr glide sheath

A randomized comparison of elective transradial coronary intervention using 6.5-Fr Sheathless Eaucathe guide catheter vs. 6.0-Fr glide sheath - RCT using Sheathless Eaucathe guide catheter and Glide Sheath Slender

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000019739

Enrollment

600

Registered

2016-01-10

Start date

2015-01-10

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease who were treated by elective transradial percutaneous coronary intervention

Interventions

6.5-Fr sheathless guide catheter is used during elective percutaneous coronary intervention. The eligible participant can in principle be registered in one or two percutaneous coronary interventions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with stable coronary intervention who are planed to undergo elective transradial coronary intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient who are planed to undergo transfemoral coronary intervention or emergent coronary intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The primary endpoint was access site complications, including radial artery (RA) spasm during the procedure, ultrasound-evaluated RA occlusion at 1 month.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The secondary endpoints included procedural success and non-access site complications.	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKazunori Horie

Sendai Kousei Hospital Cardiovascular Division

horihori1015@gmail.com+81-22-222-6181

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026