Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of transcatheter closure of paravalvular leaks

Safety and Efficacy of transcatheter closure of paravalvular leaks - Catheter closure of PVL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000019656
Enrollment
15
Registered
2015-11-10
Start date
2015-12-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

symptomatic paravalvular leak after valve replacement surgery

Interventions

To deploy occlusion device( Amplatzer Vascular Plug II(IV) or Occultech PLD device) according to the size and shape of the PVLs. Anatomy and location of the PVL should be carefully reviewed to determi

Sponsors

Kyushu University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who meet all the following criteria at the screening period are eligible for the study: 1) More than 20 years of age 2) Presence of paravalvular leak after valve replacement 3) Life expectancy more than 1 year 4) Suitable anatomy for transcatheter closure of the PVLs 5) No coagulopathy disease 6) Presence of either or both for symptomatic(NYHA class 2 or more)heart failure due to paravalvular regurgitation post valve replacement of the mitral /aortic valve or refractory hemolytic anemia due to PVLs requiring frequent episodes of transfusion(Hb<10g/dl and LDH>600IU/l and haptoglobin<10mg/dl. or requirement of MAP transfusion or EPO administration during recent 90days to achieve Hb level >10g/dl). 7) Patients deemed as high risk or inoperable for re-do surgery 8) Patients is informed well and can understand the study protocol by the attending physician. 9) Patients give written informed consent voluntarily to attend the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who, at the start of screening, meet any of the following criteria are not eligible for the study: 1) Uncorrectable coagulopathy or bleeding tendency. 2) Contraindication for emergent transfusion/antiplatelet 3) Anatomically difficult for femoral puncture 4) Severe liver dysfunction 5) Severe uncontrollable systemic or local infection 6) Known allergy or contraindication for contrast 7) Known allergy for nickel/titan/stenless steel/platinum/iridium 8) Past history of severe drug allergy 9) Patients with organic lesion with hemorrhagic risk including hemorrhagic stroke within past six months 10) Patients with possible bleeding disorder(internal malignancy, diverticulitis, colitis, subacute bacterial endocarditis, severe hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes etc) 11) Patients enrolled to other clinical study with intervention or clinical trial by medicine or device within past six months 12) Intracardiac thrombus formation 13) Patients deemed as inappropriate for participating in the study by principal investigator or subinvestigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Technical success rate of deployment of the closing device in the acute settings.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Severe Adverse events observed during the whole study period. Improvement of hemolytic anemia (LDH, Hb, Ht, Haptoglobin, TBil, urine bil) Improvement of paravalvular regurgitation (by Echo), LV function, LV size, BNP level Improvement of NYHA class Improvement of QOL score as determined by MLHFQ

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakeshi Arita

Kyushu University Hospital Heart Center

takeshi.arita@gmail.com092-642-5235

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026