Skip to content

18F flutemetamol amyloid-beta PET imaging compared with 11CPIB across the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease

18F flutemetamol amyloid-beta PET imaging compared with 11CPIB across the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease - 18F flutemetamol and 11CPIB PET imaging across Alzheimer's disease

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000019573
Enrollment
200
Registered
2015-11-02
Start date
2011-11-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer&#39

Interventions

11CPIB was injected intravenously as a bolus with a mean dose of 551.5 +- 39.7 MBq. Dynamic PET scanning in the three dimensional mode was performed for 60 min using a predetermined protocol of 31 fra

Sponsors

Shonan-Atsugi hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: AD subjects were older than 56 years, and met the core clinical criteria of the NIA Alzheimer's Association for probable AD. MCI subjects were older than 56 years, and met the Core Clinical Criteria for MCI proposed by the NIA Alzheimer's Association. The normal cognitive status of HC subjects was required to be a MMSE score of 28 or greater and a CDR score of 0. All subjects or their caregiver provided written informed consent for participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: AD subjects were older than 56 years, and met the core clinical criteria of the NIA-Alzheimer's Association for probable AD. MCI subjects were older than 56 years, and met the Core Clinical Criteria for MCI proposed by the NIA-Alzheimer's Association. The normal cognitive status of HC subjects was required to be a MMSE score of 28 or greater and a CDR score of 0. All subjects or their caregiver provided written informed consent for participation. Participants were excluded if they had other systemic or brain diseases,including degenerative,vascular, depressive, traumatic, medical comorbidities, mixed disease, or traumatic brain injury.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The cortical FMM SUVR in AD patients was significantly greater than in older HC subjects 1.76 +- 0.23 vs 1.30 +- 0.26, p<0.01. Six-eight MCI patients had a bimodal distribution of SUVR, and 29 of them 42.6% had positive scans. Cortical FMM SUVR values were strongly correlated with PIB DVR r=0.94, n=145, p<0.001.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cortical FMM SUVR was negatively correlated with MMSE scores r= -0.51, n=145, p<0.05 and positively with CDR SB scores r=0.49, n=145, p<0.05 when all groups were analyzed together. There was no significant difference in the mean cortical FMM SUVR between APOE 4 carriers and non-carriers in each group

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactSizuo Hatashita

Shonan-Atsugi hospital Department of neurosurgery

tiken2@shonan-atsugi.jp046-297-7576

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026