Comparison between quantitative evaluation with a new digitalized suction system and qualitative evaluation with a conventional suction system for the amount of air leakage after lung resection

Comparison between quantitative evaluation with a new digitalized suction system and qualitative evaluation with a conventional suction system for the amount of air leakage after lung resection - Comparison between quantitative evaluation with a new digitalized suction system and qualitative evaluation with a conventional suction system for the amount of air leakage after lung resection

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000019499

Enrollment

Registered

2015-10-26

Start date

2015-07-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

lung resection

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: none

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with pneumonectomy or bleeding tendency

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
In the evaluation of the amount of air leakage using the conventional system, the degree was classified into four categories	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactFutoshi Ishiguro

Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Department of Thoracic Surgery

hishi@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp052-744-2375

Outcome results