Skip to content

Safety of Percutaneous Cryoablation in Patients with Painful Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors: A Single Center Prospective Study (SCIRO-1502)

Safety of Percutaneous Cryoablation in Patients with Painful Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors: A Single Center Prospective Study (SCIRO-1502) - Cryoablation for painful bone and soft tissue tumors (SCIRO-1502)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000019077
Enrollment
10
Registered
2015-12-01
Start date
2015-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Painful bone and soft tissue tumor

Interventions

Following percutaneously inserting electrode(IceSeed or IceRod
Galil Medical, Yokneam, Israel), cryoablation for painful bone and soft tissue tumor is performed using CryoHit (Galil Medical)
cryoablation is performed in two cycles of maximum 15 minutes freezing and at least 2 minutes thawing.

Sponsors

Okayama University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Painful bone and soft tissue tumor with resistance of medication. 2) Pathologically confirmed painful bone and soft tissue tumor. 3) Target lesion is evaluated with imagings. 4) Life expectancy >= 1 month. 5) Written informed consent. 6) Patient's age is more than 20 years old. 7) Not a candidate for surgery or refuse surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Vital organ and/or vessel on the needle route. 2) Patient has the following comorbidities. a) Heart failure (NYHA >= III) b) Active infection except for virus hepatitis 3) Body temperature of 38 degree or more. 4) Target lesion is not able to be evaluated with imagings. 5) Pregnant. 6) Worse bone fracture caused by cryoablation. 7) Worse quality of life caused by cryoablation. 8) Inadequate cardiac, hepatic, renal, respiratory, coagulation, and bone marrow functions. 9) Not eligible determined by the responding physician.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of adverse events (Time Frame: 1 month post-cryoablation)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in VAS, efficacy, and imagings 1 month after cryoablation

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactToshihiro Iguchi

Okayama University Hospital Department of Radiology

iguchi@cc.okayama-u.ac.jp+81-86-235-7313

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026