Skip to content

Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation

Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation - Study protocol; a meta-epidemiological investigation in overstatements in abstract conclusions

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000018668
Enrollment
100
Registered
2015-08-14
Start date
2015-08-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental disorders

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All randomized controlled trials published in 2014 claiming effectiveness of intervention for mental disorder(s) in their abstract conclusions. The selection will cover any and all kinds of interventions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Studies with an abstract conclusion in which the primary outcomes were declared, and explicitly stated that there was no significant difference between the intervention and control arm in the primary outcomes. In addition, we will exclude studies without conclusion or discussion section in the abstract, trials with more than two arms, and unpublished trials. Secondary analysis studies, feasibility studies, and cost effectiveness studies will not be included either.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The proportion of studies showing overstatements in the abstract conclusion compared to the full text results relative to all the included trials.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The proportion (shown as relative to all the included trials) of studies showing overstatements in abstract conclusion among those studies claiming superiority of intervention of treatment. The proportion of studies that exhibit overstatements among those that claim partial effectiveness of intervention.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactShinohara, Kiyomi

Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health Health Promotion and Human Behaviour

shinohara.kiyomi.75r@st.kyoto-u.ac.jp0757539491

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026