Skip to content

A multicenter prospective comparative crossover trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration between with and without the needle stylet using with the 22 gauge fine-needle aspiration needle

A multicenter prospective comparative crossover trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration between with and without the needle stylet using with the 22 gauge fine-needle aspiration needle - Comparative crossover trial of EUS-FNA with and without stylet

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000018359
Enrollment
100
Registered
2015-07-20
Start date
2015-07-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic solid masses detected by imaging examination

Interventions

At first and third aspiration,EUSFNA with stylet is performed. At second and forth aspiration, EUS-FNA without stylet is performed. At first and third aspiration,EUSFNA without stylet is performed

Sponsors

Tokyo Medical University Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Lead Sponsor
National Cancer Center Hospital Endoscopy division
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patients with solid pancreatic mass, which can be punctured from stomach or duodenum using 22G safely. 2) Patients consent to be included in the study based on his/her own free will after sufficient informing and understanding of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Cases in Perfomance status 4 2)Cases with sever complication in other organs except original disease (ASA classification more than 3) 3)Cases having impossibility of cessation of anticoagulant 4)Cases with pregnancy or suspect of pregnancy 5)Cases having difficulty in endoscopic approach 6)Cases with definite diagnosis by another biopsy 7) Cases having difficulty in visualization of mass on EUS 8)Cases judged by principal investigator to be inadequate as subjects

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Accuracy

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cellularity of tissue obtained Quality of tissue obtained Adequate quality

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactShuntaro Mukai

Tokyo Medical University Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

maezora1031@yahoo.co.jp03-3342-6111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026