Skip to content

Cuffed vs uncuffed endtrachial tube - randomized controlled trial in pediatric patients younger than 6-year-old including neonates at single institute

Cuffed vs uncuffed endtrachial tube - randomized controlled trial in pediatric patients younger than 6-year-old including neonates at single institute - Micro-SPA (Microcuff Suitable for Pediatric Anesthesia)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000017213
Enrollment
1150
Registered
2015-04-21
Start date
2015-04-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General anesthetized patients requiring endtracheal intubation

Interventions

Intervention: Intubate using cuffed tracheal tube (Microcuffe endotracheal tube / Halyard Healthcare, Inc.) Control: Intubate using uncuffed tracheal tube (PORTEX endotracheal tube / Smiths Medica

Sponsors

Department of intensive care and anesthesia, National Center for Child Health and Development
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Children who are undergoing elective surgery or examination requiring enrtracheal intubation under general anesthesia 2) Children with parental written informed consent 3) Children who are planed to extubabe in operation room, stay at recovery room until getting stable, and then go back to ward 4) Children from newborns to younger than 6 years of age (Newborns are required to be born at full-term of gestation and weight more than or equal to 3 kg.)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Children who are undergoing urgent or emergency surgery 2) Children who have impaired functions of airway and/or swallowing 3) Children who are known or predicted to have difficulty in airway management 4) Children who have upper respiratory infection within 2 weeks or lower respiratory infection within 4 weeks 5) Children who are undergoing surgical interventions into airway itself or lung (e.g. adenoidectomy) 6) Children who had been enrolled in this study 7) Children with severe general status (ASA PS >2)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Presence of inspiratory stridor after extubation in operation room and/or recovery room

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Secondary outcomes 1) Tube exchange 2) Therapy for inspiratory stridor after extubation (nebulized epinephrine and/or continuous positive airway pressure) 3) Time from extubation to leaving recovery room 4) Impaired airway track due to intubation itself (laryngospasm and/or tracheal hemorrhage) 5) Re-intubation 6) Unexpected ICU-admission due to airway problems 7) Need for oxygen at the time of leaving recovery room 8) Residual inspiratory stridor at the time of leaving recovery room 2. Experimental endpoints 1) Accidental one lung ventilation 2) Adjustment of tube position after intubation 3) Reliability of EtCO2 wave 4) Need for fresh gas flow more than 4L/min 5) Adjustment of cuff pressure due to accidental change in cuff pressure (Group A) 6) Change in length of tube position more than or equal to 1 cm 7) Need for pharyngeal gauze packing 8) Inappropriate location of tube tip detected with chest X-ray

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYasuhiro Kogure

National Center for Child Health and Development Department of intensive care and anesthesia

kogure-y@ncchd.go.jp+81-3-3416-0181

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026