Skip to content

A comparison of the performance of supraglottic devices in children: a bayesian network meta-analysis

A comparison of the performance of supraglottic devices in children: a bayesian network meta-analysis - A comparison of the performance of supraglottic devices in children: a bayesian network meta-analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000017098
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2015-04-10
Start date
2015-04-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Children who underwent general anesthesia

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Kanagawa Childrens Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All randomized controlled trials that included a component comparing supraglottic devices in children who underwent general anaesthesia were included in this study. All type of laryngeal mask, laryngeal tube, i-gel, and air Q were considered supraglottic devices.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: We excluded case reports, reviews, and animal studies. Eligibility was not restricted by language, type of surgery, or anaesthesia technique.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
oropharyngeal leak pressure insertion success/failure at the first attempt blood staining on device

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The post hoc secondary outcome is SGA failure.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakahiro Mihara

Kanagawa Childrens Medical Center Department of Anesthesiology

miharaxxxtotoro@yahoo.co.jp045-711-2351

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026