The Effect of Intraperitoneal Nebulization: Ropivacaine vs Lignocaine in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Conditions
Interventions
Group L = Inj Lignocaine topical 4% 3mg/kg (maximum 4ml)
Group R = Inj Ropivacaine 0.75% 3mg/kg (maximum 4ml)
Sponsors
Department of Anaesthesiology MKCG Medical College
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 100 patients of ASA I-II, age 20-60 yrs., wt. 40-60 kg scheduled for routine elective lap surgeries under GA
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1.Pre-op pain other than biliary colic 2.Chronic pain t/t or anti-epileptic therapy 3.H/O alcohol or drug addiction 4.Severe hepatic or renal impairment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| We conclude that intraperitoneal instillation of local an-aesthetic is an easy, cheap, and non-invasive method which provides better perioperative hemodynamic control along with good analgesia in the immediate postoperative period after laparoscopic surgery. This effect evaluated better with Lignocaine as compared to Ropivacaine. So Lignocaine can be used as a low cost alternative. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The chief limitation of the study is poor visualization of the surgical field for the first few minutes which may delay the surgical procedure | — |
Countries
Asia(except Japan)
Contacts
Public ContactDr. Nibedita Sahoo
MKCG Medical College & Hospital Department of Anaesthesiology
Outcome results
None listed