Skip to content

Examination about accuracy of quantitative vessel angiography during endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal lesions: A comparative analysis of quantitative vessel angiography and intravascular ultrasound and computed tomography

Examination about accuracy of quantitative vessel angiography during endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal lesions: A comparative analysis of quantitative vessel angiography and intravascular ultrasound and computed tomography - Examination about accuracy of quantitative vessel angiography during endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal lesions

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000016578
Enrollment
30
Registered
2015-02-23
Start date
2015-02-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD)

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Age>=20, male or female. 2.Getting informed consent form a patient or legal guardian. 3.Rutherford classification category 2-6 (including critical limb ischemia) and significant stenotic lesion in the femoropopliteal artery. 4.Patient scheduled to receive stent implantation. 5.Patient who already received stent implantation, and scheduled to receive endovascular therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previous history of allergy to contrast materials and materials used in the investigational device. 2. Estimated glomerular filtrateion rate is less than 30ml/min/1.73m2. Hemodialysis patient are not excluded. 3. Patient who is determined to be unsuitable for this study by principal investigator or subinvestigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Differences of vessel diameters measured by QVA and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). 2. Differences of stent length measured by QVA, CT and IVUS.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Relationship between distance from calibration point and each accuracy

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactShinsuke Mori

Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital Cardiology

hello_morisun@yahoo.co.jp045-576-3000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026