A randomized controlled traial for comparison of surgical outcomes under low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum on a standard insufflator versus AirSeal system for laparoscopic hysterectomy.

A randomized controlled traial for comparison of surgical outcomes under low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum on a standard insufflator versus AirSeal system for laparoscopic hysterectomy. - Comparison of surgical outcomes on a standard CO2 insufflator versus AirSeal system.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000016393

Enrollment

100

Registered

2015-02-02

Start date

2015-02-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

uterine myoma

Interventions

laparoscopic hysterectomy using standard CO2 insufflator laparoscopic hysterectomy using AirSeal system

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with uterine myoma whose uterus is located in pelvic cavity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient suspected malignancy, patient who wishes to pregnant, and patients with bleeding disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
surgical duration	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactJun Kumakiri

Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Obstetrics and Gynecology

kumakiri@juntendo.ac.jp03-3813-3111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026