Pancreatic carcinoma, Biliary carcinoma
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Cases with lymphadenopathy detected by EUS Cases with pancreatobiliary tumors confirmed by the other imag9ng methods. Written informed consent ECOG performance stautus = 0-2
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Inapropriate to perform endoscopic ultrasonography Faiulre of other organs (ASA: Grade 3, 4) Inability to obtain informed consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the diagnostic accuracy of standard EUS, color Doppler EUS and CH-EUS in terms of the ability to differentiate malignant nodes from benign nodes. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the accuracy of CH-EUS and EUS-FNA in terms of N-stage diagnosis | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Kinki University Faculty of Medicine Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology