Mucosal and submucosal colorectal neoplasm
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Digestive Disease center
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: All cases that colorectal neoplasm is resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: The case that colorectal neoplasm can not be resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Postoperative stricure was diagnosed when a standard 11.5mm diameter colonoscope could not be negotiated through the colonic segment at the site of ESD. Follow-up endoscopy was performed 4 to 6 months later. If patients had any different clinical symptoms from those prior to the ESD, endoscopy was performed in order to check for post-ESD stenosis. All cases were divided into two groups, that is, presence or absence of postoperative stricture. The two groups were compared in respect of the patient age, gender, concomitant disease that might affect ESD ulcer healing, the tumor location, macroscopic type, longitudinal and circumferential diameter of the resected specimens, circumferential extent of the mucosal defect, and depth of invasion.The risk factor of postoperative stricure is clarified | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Public ContactTAKEMASA HAYASHI
Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital Digective Disease Center
Outcome results
None listed