Skip to content

Effectiveness of Press Tack Needle among patients with knee pain.

Effectiveness of Press Tack Needle among patients with knee pain. - Effectiveness of Press Needle among elderly with chronic knee pain -Double blind randomized controlled trial-

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000015637
Enrollment
100
Registered
2014-11-10
Start date
2012-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of the knee

Interventions

A computer program was used to randomly allocate 100 participants with chronic knee pain to either a Press Needle group or a Sham Press Needle group. Participants in both groups received intervention
5 points&quot
, they were pressed for two days. The Press Needle used in this trial was Press Needle manufactured by SEIRIN Inc &quot
length
0.6mm, diameter
0.2mm&quot
. For the Sham Press Needle group, Sham Press Needle by which the needle was removed was used. Evaluation was performed before the first intervention, after the two days, seven days and one month. In

Sponsors

Project research institutes, comprehensive research organization, WASEDA university
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1,Man and Woman aged 65 and over. 2,Kellgren-Lawrence clasification, grad 1 or more. 3,Duration of disease more than 3 months. 4,Injection in an articulation genus is not carried out within four weeks. 5,Tere is no acupuncture to knee within three months. 6,A neurological unusual view is not seen.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1,Central-nerves system disease (stroke, Parkinson disease dementia etc.) 2,Orthopedic disease (osteoarthritis of the hip, foot sprain etc.) 3,Autoimmune disease (chronic rheumatoid arthritis, systematic lupus erythematosus.) 4,Psychiatric disorder. 5,Rash in the plaster easy. 6,When it has allergy to metal. 7,When an inflammatory reaction is strong. 8,When it is judged for reasons of mind and body that the participation in this study is impossible.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
WOMAC (western ontario mcmaster universities osteoarthritis index), japanese version .

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Visual analog scale SF-8 Questionnaire on adverse events

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public Contactjunichi watanabe

Project research institutes, comprehensive research organization, WASEDA university Research Institute for Elderly Helth.

ptiwemonat@yahoo.co.jp09043366896

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026