Skip to content

Comparison of efficacy between tacrolimus and cyclosporine for the treatment of polymyositis/dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease

Comparison of efficacy between tacrolimus and cyclosporine for the treatment of polymyositis/dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease - Comparison between tacrolimus and cyclosporine for the treatment of PM/DM-ILD

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000015469
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-10-18
Start date
2014-10-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

polymyositis/dermatomyositis/clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis-associated Interstitial lung disease

Interventions

arm1: tacrolimus and predonisolon therapy for 52 weeks Initial dose of oral prednisolone is 0.6 - 1 mg/kg/day. Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy (1 g/day for 3 days) is permitted accord

Sponsors

Second Division, Department of Internal medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The diagnosis of PM or DM was based on the criteria of Bohan and Peter criteria: 1) systemic muscle weakness, 2) increased serum muscle enzyme levels, 3) electromyographic (EMG) evidence of myopathic changes, 4) typical histologic findings in muscle biopsies, and/or 5) characteristic dermatologic manifestations of DM. The diagnosis was considered definite, probable, or possible according to the number of criteria fulfilled (at least 4, 3, or 2, respectively, including the dermatologic manifestations for diagnosis of DM), and patients with definite or probable PM/DM were included in the study. CADM was diagnosed when a patient had a skin rash characteristic of DM without clinical evidence of muscle disease and with little or no increase in the serum creatine kinase (CK) level. Interstitial lung disease was diagnosed on the basis of the presence of high resolution computed tomography abnormalities in combination with one or more of the following; dyspnea on exertion, serum KL-6 level > 500 U/ml, arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) < 80mmHg, %FVC < 80%, %DLCO < 65%.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who met the following criteria are excluded from this study: (i) no evidence of deterioration in interstitial lung disease for more than 6 months; (ii) the presence of a serious comorbidity (e.g. malignancy, liver dysfunction, and renal dysfunction); (iii) use of immunosuppressants (except for corticosteroid), intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, plasma exchange.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Progression free survival rate at week 52

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Overall survival rate at week 52 Change in forced vital capacity from baseline at week 52. Change in DLCO, 6MWT,PaO2, KL-6 and SP-D from baseline at week 4, 12, 24 and 52.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTomoyuki Fujisawa

Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Second Division, Department of Internal Medicine

fujisawa@hama-med.ac.jp053-435-2263

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026