Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation A prospective randomized study

Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation A prospective randomized study - Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000014636

Enrollment

Registered

2014-07-24

Start date

2014-07-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients who underwent general anesthesia

Interventions

Intubation by direct laryngscope Intubation by indirect laryngscope

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who underwent general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with anticipated difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Success rate and intubaiton time for tracheal intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Subjective difficulty of laryngoscopy and tube passage through the glottis	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactNobuyasu Komasawa

Osaka Medical College Anesthesiology

ane078@poh.osaka-med.ac.jp072-683-1221

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026