Evaluation of the PEEP effect of nasal high flow compared with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation

Evaluation of the PEEP effect of nasal high flow compared with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation - Evaluation of the PEEP effect of nasal high flow

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000014133

Enrollment

Registered

2014-06-01

Start date

2012-09-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients receiving non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for respiratory failure

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Among patients under management of NPPV for more than 24 hours, those who meet the following criteria at the 5cmH2O PEEP level; 1) 300 > P/F ratio > 200 2) 15 < respiratory rate < 30/min

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients younger than 18 years old or with Glasgow Coma Scale less than 14 or with body mass index (BMI) more than 30

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The difference of partial pressure of arterial oxygen tension to inspiratory oxygen fraction ratio and respiratory ratio between NHF and NPPV	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The rate of rescue NIV therapy and intubation, the frequency of respiratory failure, the duration of NHF therapy, the length of ICU stay after weaning from NIV, and acceptability of NHF therapy compared with NIV	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakeshi Suzuki

Keio University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology

takeshi-su@a7.keio.jp03-3353-1211

Outcome results