Comparison of closure method between hemoclip and snare coaglation after endoscopic mucosal resection

Comparison of closure method between hemoclip and snare coaglation after endoscopic mucosal resection - Closure method between hemoclip and snare coaglation

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000013473

Enrollment

130

Registered

2014-04-01

Start date

2014-04-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coolorectal polipoid lesion within 20 mm which is indication of EMR

Interventions

Post EMR site closure by hemoclip Post EMR coaglation by tip of snare

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Colorectal polyp within 20 mm in diameter

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Colorectal polyp over 20 mm in diameter

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Post EMR treatment procedure time between clip and snare coaglation group	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.Post EMR bleeding rate of treatment between clip and snare coaglation group 2.Treatment cost between clip and snare coaglation group	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public Contactkazunori Yamashita

Ehime Rousai Hospital Medical Affairs Division

ijikachou@ehimerosai.jp0897-33-6191

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026