eldely people in geriatric facility
Conditions
Interventions
In the intervention group, clients and occupational therapists begins to share and identifiy meaningful occupations for the client by using Aid for Decision-making in Occupation Choice (ADOC). Then, o
Real-occupationnal practice (P-ADL)"
and "
Real-occupational practice (except for P-ADL)"
, and as appropriate, intervention in TOP group was allowed the "
Basic function exercise"
Simulated occupation practice"
within the range of 1/3.
In the control group, occupational therapist focus evaluations on the patient'
s generic abilities (i.e., boby functions and structures according to the ICF) and personal activities of daily living (P-ADL). During the care facility stay, majority interventions (had to be more th
, and as appropriate, intervention in BOT group was allowed the "
within the range of 1/3. This intervention was usual practice in all occupational therapist participated in this study (data not shown).
Sponsors
Kanagawa University of Human Services
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Participants don't have progressive disease, constitutional symptoms are stable, communication and a cognitive function not having the major problem. They conducted individual training twice a week.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: MMSE<10 Participants have difficulty in communication. We will stop studying that the participant could not carry on occupational therapy as judged by a primary doctor or participant and their family hope for a cancellation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey(japanes version) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Barthel index(Activities of daliy living:ADL) Occupational performance Autonomy:OPA Total medical cost or total care cost | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Public ContactHirofumi Nagayama
Kanagawa University of Human Services Department of occupational therapy
Outcome results
None listed