Skip to content

Comparison of occupational therapy intervention process for subacute stroke patient: A pilot randomised controlled study

Comparison of occupational therapy intervention process for subacute stroke patient: A pilot randomised controlled study - occupational therapy intervention process

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000012955
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-01-25
Start date
2012-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

subacute stroke patients

Interventions

In the bottom-up (BOT) group, occupational therapists focus evaluations on the patients generic abilities (i.e., boby functions and structures according to the ICF) and personal activities of daily li
Basic function exercise&#39
Simulated occupation practice&#39
, and as appropriate, intervention in BOT group was allowed the &#39
Real-occupationnal practice (P-ADL)&#39
Real-occupational practice (except for P-ADL) within the range of 1/3. In the top-down (TOP) group, patient and occupational therapists begins to share and identifiy meaningful occupations for the pat
Real-occupational practice (except for P-ADL)&#39
, and as appropriate, intervention in TOP group was allowed the &#39
within the range of 1/3.

Sponsors

Kounosuke Tomori
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: This study of participation include patients with hemiparesis in the subacute stage of stroke who were hospitalized at Kaifukuki rehabilitation ward. Stroke was caused by a cerebral infarct or intracerebral hemorrhageonset; onset ≥30 days; no major cognitive deficits (24 of 30 on the Mini-Mental State Examination), aphasia or depression as an obstacle to daily living.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: We excluded patient who had cardiac or progressive disease and could not carry on occupational therapy as judged by a primary doctor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
SF-36(MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Functional independent measure (FIM) Client satisfaction questionnaire(CSQ-8) Brunnstrom recovery stage

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKounosuke Tomori

Kanagawa University of Human Services Dividion of Occupational therapy

adoc.project@gmail.com046-828-2724

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026