Comparison of the usability of Airtraq, Kingvision and Airwayscope for oral intubation in normal airway patients.

Comparison of the usability of Airtraq, Kingvision and Airwayscope for oral intubation in normal airway patients. - Comparison of the usability of Airtraq, Kingvision and Airwayscope for oral intubation.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000012828

Enrollment

Registered

2014-01-11

Start date

2013-12-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

patients scheduled for elective operation

Interventions

Airtraq group:30 Airwayscope group:30 Kingvision:30

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients scheduled for elective operation and required general anesthesia and tracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Anesthesiologists physical status 4, history of cervical spine injury, difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
time to intubation, view of glottis	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
adverse event	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTerumi Marui

Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital department of anesthesiology

marumaru@wj9.so-net.ne.jp045-971-1151

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026