Comparative study between endoscopic nasogallbladder drainage (ENGBD) and endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) for acute cholecystitis: Prospective multi-center randomized trial

Comparative study between endoscopic nasogallbladder drainage (ENGBD) and endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) for acute cholecystitis: Prospective multi-center randomized trial - Endoscopic nasogallbladder drainage (ENGBD) vs endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) for acute cholecystitis

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000012316

Enrollment

Registered

2013-11-15

Start date

2012-09-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute cholecystitis

Interventions

Gallbladder drainage (ENGBD) Gallbladder drainage (EGBS)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients in whom gallbladder drainage are needed. Patients consent to be included in the study based on his/her own free will after sufficient informing and understanding of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Cases having difficulty in endoscopic approach 2) Cases in Performance status 4 3) Cases in Metaric sten placement 4) Cases with prior surgically altered anatomy without Billroth-I 5) Cases with sever complication in other organs 6) Cases without informed consent 7) Cases judged by principal investigator to be inadequate as subjects

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Successful rate of ENGBD or EGBS	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Kinds and frequency of complications	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakao Itoi

Tokyo Medical University Department of the 4th Internal medicine (Gastroenterology and Hepatology)

itoi@tokyo-med.ac.jp03-3342-6111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026