Skip to content

Short-term outcomes and potential advantages of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach.

Short-term outcomes and potential advantages of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach. - Robotic vs. laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000011749
Enrollment
650
Registered
2013-10-01
Start date
2009-01-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric cancer

Interventions

Robotic gastrectomy Laparoscopic gastrectomy

Sponsors

Division of upper GI, Department of surgery, Fujita Health Univeristy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Primary gastric cancer for which surgical treatment was applicable(cStageI-III)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Palliative operation: H(+), P(+), Cy(+) Insufficient physical function (open gastrectomy, reduced extent of lymphadenectomy). Double cancer. Initial 10 cases for each operating surgeons.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Morbidity

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative hospital stay

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKoichi Suda

Fujita Health University Division of Upper GI, Department of Surgery

ko-suda@fujita-hu.ac.jp0562-93-9254

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026