Hepatic tumor
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients who undergo an EOB-enhanced dynamic MRI scan performed in accordance with the product information approved in Japan during the past one year before the time when it becomes possible to start this study at each institution on and after April 1, 2013 (will be enrolled in this study consecutively in an unselected manner) (2) Patients who undergo an EOB-enhanced dynamic MRI scan at a magnetic field strength of 1.5 T or higher using a fat-suppressed 3D-gradient echo (GRE) sequence with an MRI scanner manufactured by GE, SIEMENS, PHILIPS, or TOSHIBA (3) Inpatient or outpatient (4) Male or female patients (5) Patients aged 20 or more and less than 85 years (6) Patients with a serum creatinine level below the institutional upper limit of normal (7) Patients with liver disease of any etiology (8) Patients with a body weight below 100 kg (9) Patients who are awake and alert (10) Patients prescribed with EOB in accordance with the product information approved in Japan
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients with documented occurrence of motion artifacts (due to inappropriate breath holding) in MR images taken before use of EOB (2) Patients with portal vein thromboembolism30) (3) Patients with multiple (10 lesions or more) or giant hepatic mass lesions (60 mm or more)30) (4) Patients in whom MRI is contraindicated (with a pacemaker implanted) (5) Patients with known hypersensitivity to gadolinium contrast media (6) Patients with bronchial asthma or serious allergies (7) Patients with serious renal impairment (8) Pregnant or nursing patients (9) Patients listed in the enrollment log redundantly (10) Any others judged ineligible for enrollment in this study by the investigator at each institution
Design outcomes
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| (1) Distribution of the scores of truncation artifacts by EOB-enhanced dynamic MRI imaging condition (2) Correlation between the conspicuity of lesions and the distribution of the scores of truncation artifacts | — |
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| primary endpoint: MRI scanner-related conditions Imaging Timing Setting Technique Voxel Size Matrix K-space Ordering Data Acquisition Time (time to take arterial phase images) Reduction Factor for Parallel Imaging Flip Angle Fat Suppression Technique Magnetic Field Strength EOB administration-related conditions Rate of Administration of EOB Amount of Saline for Flushing; The correlation between the occurrence of truncation artifacts in arterial phase images after administration of EOB and these EOB-enhanced dynamic MRI imaging conditions will be statistically analyzed. | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Kinki University Faculty of Medicine Department of Radiology