A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THREE DIFFERENT SURGICAL PROCEDURES FOR CONJUNCTIVOCHALASIS

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THREE DIFFERENT SURGICAL PROCEDURES FOR CONJUNCTIVOCHALASIS - THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THREE DIFFERENT SURGICAL PROCEDURES FOR CONJUNCTIVOCHALASIS

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000011170

Enrollment

Registered

2013-07-11

Start date

2012-10-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

conjunctivochalasis

Interventions

cautery tucking resection and stitching

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: subjects having aged conjunctivochalasis accompanied with ocular discomfort including foreign body sensation, ocular pain, eyestrain and watery eye.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: subjects who had ocular sergeries contact lens users subjects having any ocular surface diseases other than conjunctivochalasis and dry eye eye drops users subjects who don't consent in written form subjects who are ruled unfit to the entry to the study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
he duration of procedure, complications, frequency of residual conjunctival folds, subjective tolerability of surgery, tear breakup time and subjective symptoms	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMutusmi Ishii

Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital Institutional Review Board

mishii@tdc.ac.jp047-322-0151

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026