comparison of negative pressure wound therapy between V.A.C and Renasys

comparison of negative pressure wound therapy between V.A.C and Renasys - comparison of negative pressure wound therapy

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000009283

Enrollment

Registered

2012-11-12

Start date

2012-11-12

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

burn and skin defect

Interventions

Each form of VAC and RENASYS is used to a half of wound region.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patient who obtained its consent for the competitive examination of the negative pressure wound therapy with a skin defect or a burn

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. The patient with infection 2. The patient with necrosis tissue 3. The patient who has poor control of the bleeding 4. The patient having the allergic symptoms such as bronchial asthma, hives 5. In addition, the patient, judged the participation in this study to be inappropriate by the attending doctor

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
size, the condition of granulation, histology	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakaharu Hatano

Osaka City University Plastic and reconstructive surgery

hatano0321@yahoo.co.jp06-6645-3892

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026