A prospective randomized comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration between with and without the needle stylet using with the 22 gauge fine-needle aspiration needle

A prospective randomized comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration between with and without the needle stylet using with the 22 gauge fine-needle aspiration needle - Comparative study of EUS-FNA with and without stylet

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000008695

Enrollment

167

Registered

2012-08-15

Start date

2012-04-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Solid lision detected by imaging study needs EUS-FNA from stomach or duodenum

Interventions

Puncture without stylet Puncture with stylet

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Solid tunor detected by imaging study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: <20 years old Enforcement of EUS-FNA is inappropriate

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Existance of histologically determinable target tissue	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The quality of the specimen, diagnosis of the specimen about benignancy or malignancy, puncture site and complication	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMidori Nishioka

Hokkaido University Hospital Clinical trial center

midorin@med.hokudai.ac.jp011-716-1161

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026