Skip to content

A Multicenter Randomized Comparison of Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon Catheter with Conventional Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Bare-metal Stent Restenosis and Drug-eluting Stent Restenosis

A Multicenter Randomized Comparison of Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon Catheter with Conventional Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Bare-metal Stent Restenosis and Drug-eluting Stent Restenosis - Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon for In-stent restenosis.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000008681
Enrollment
210
Registered
2012-08-14
Start date
2009-10-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic heart disease

Interventions

paclitaxel-eluting balloon conventional balloon angioplasty

Sponsors

Nipro Corporation (Osaka, Japan)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria were ISR in bare-metal stent or drug-eluting stent (sirolimus-eluting, zotarolimus-eluting or everolimus-eluting stent), reference vessel diameter of 2.0–4.0 mm, and lesion length of less than 22 mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The lesion containing proximal or distal tortuosity with more than 90-degree angle; multiple lesions in the target vessel; total coronary artery occlusion; heavily calcified lesion; lesion in bypass graft; or bifurcation lesion with side branch of larger than 2.0 mm in diameter was not regarded as the target lesion. Clinical exclusion criteria were as follows: left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 30%; myocardial infarction within 72 hr before enrollment; intolerance to antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, drugs similar to paclitaxel and contrast media; acute or chronic renal dysfunction with serum creatinine level of not less than 1.5 mg/dL; patients with severe concomitant systemic illness whom the treating physician considered it better to exclude; any coronary intervention procedure within previous 28 days; patients with cerebral infarction, transient cerebral ischemic attack or hemorrhagic gastric ulcer within previous 6 months; women who were pregnant or of childbearing potential; patients with implantation of DES within previous 6months; and patients with left main disease (LMT>50% diameter stenosis).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
target vessel failure (TVF) at 6-month follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
lesion success (attainment of less than 50% in-stent residual stenosis of the target lesion, as measured by quantitative coronary angiographic analysis), and procedure success (attainment of a final lesion success and no in-hospital major adverse cardiac events). Secondary angiographic endpoints were in-stent binary restenosis rate and late lumen loss. Secondary clinical endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, death, and major adverse cardiac events.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactSeiji Habara

Kurashiki Central Hospital Department of Cardiology

sh10461@kchnet.or.jp+81-86-422-0210

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026