Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy of Irsogladine and Omeprazole Against NSAIDs-Induced Esophagitis, Peptic Ulcers, Small Intestinal Lesions in Volunteers

Comparison of the Efficacy of Irsogladine and Omeprazole Against NSAIDs-Induced Esophagitis, Peptic Ulcers, Small Intestinal Lesions in Volunteers - Comparison of the Efficacy of Irsogladine and Omeprazole Against NSAIDs-Induced Alimentary Tract Lesions

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000008114
Enrollment
32
Registered
2012-06-06
Start date
2009-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

NSAID induced Alimentary Tract Lesions

Interventions

irsogladine 4mg/day and dicrofenacNa 75mg/day for 2 weeks in oral administration omeprazole 10mg/day and dicrofenacNa75mg/day for 2 weeks in oral administration

Sponsors

Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Healthy adults who are 20 years or older, and less than 80 years of age at the time of obtaining consent 2) Subjects from whom fully informed written consent based on their full understanding and their own voluntary will was obtained when participating this study 3)Subjects who had taken no medication during the 1-month period before the start of this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Subjects with a history of peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding 2) Subjects with significant hepatic disease, renal disease, heart disease, or respiratory disease 3) Subjects with a history of gastrointestinal surgery other than appendectomy 4) Subjects orally taking or planning to orally take drug other than antiulcer drug or NSAIDs 5) Subjects with alcohol or chemical dependencies 6) Subjects with a history of intestinal obstruction, or person with suspected gastrointestinal obstruction on other tests 7)Subjects who cannot agree that surgery may be required if capsule endoscope retained in the body 8) Subjects whom otherwise the investigator determined ineligible as the subject

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The number of small intestinal mucosal breaks evaluated in the capsule endoscope.

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026