Skip to content

Comparison of Sitagliptin vs Conventional therapy On Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Comparison of Sitagliptin vs Conventional therapy On Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes - SCOOP trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000007472
Enrollment
140
Registered
2012-06-01
Start date
2011-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes

Interventions

Administration of sitagliptin no administration of sitagliptin

Sponsors

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, the University of Tokyo
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patients indicated for PCI with DES 2) Patients who are diagnosed as having DM 3) HbA1c is greater than 5.8% 4) 20 years old or older 5) Male and Female 6) Informated consent with documents

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients who present severe ketosis, or diabetic coma within 6 months 2) Patients with STEMI 3) Patients who present congestive heart failure 4) Pregnant 5) Patients with moderate to severe renal dysfunction 6) History of taking DPP-4inhibitor before 7) Administration of Glynide 8) Administration of Sulfornilurea at high dose 9) Stent implanted 10) Difficulty in performing IVUS 11) Histoiry of Cerebrovascular disease 12) Malignancy 13) Allergy 14) Patients inappropriate for medical reason

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Plaque Volume

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026