Comparison conventional and new tibial inserts in Bi-Surface type total knee arthroplasty

Comparison conventional and new tibial inserts in Bi-Surface type total knee arthroplasty - Comparison conventional and new tibial inserts in Bi-Surface type total knee arthroplasty

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000007291

Enrollment

Registered

2012-02-20

Start date

2012-02-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

osteoarthritis

Interventions

Bi-surface knee conventional tibial insert (KU4+) Bi-surface knee new tibial insert (BS5)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Osteoarthritis higher than grade 2 (Koshino grade), and higher than 35 years old. Primary total knee arthroplasty.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: can not use intramedulary rods. can not use balancer. malignancy diseases, cerebral infarction, parkinson disease, paralysis, tremor diseases, spastic diseases,

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
lateral instability more than 10 degree, Aseptic loosening, Revision	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMoritoshi Furu

Graduate school of medicine, Kyoto University department of the Control for Rheumatic diseases

morifuru@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp0757513877

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026