A comparison of analgesic efficacy of constant current and constant voltage systems in spinal cord stimulation

A comparison of analgesic efficacy of constant current and constant voltage systems in spinal cord stimulation - A comparison of analgesic efficacy of constant current and constant voltage systems

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000006731

Enrollment

Registered

2011-12-01

Start date

2011-12-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

neuropathic pain

Interventions

From Day 1 to Day 5, a constant voltage pulse system and from Day 6 to Day 10, a constant current system was applied. From Day 1 to Day 5, a constant current pulse system and from Day 6 to Day 10, a c

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)The intractable pain patient who accepts sufficient analgesic effect by neither medication nor a nerve block treatment 2)The patient who accepts the indication for spinal cord stimulation therapy. 3)The patient who was able to get the consent by the document to this research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)The patient from whom consent is not obtained by this research 2)The patient who judged that other doctors were inappropriate

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Analgesic efficacy in both groups (VAS) from day1 to day10	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
pulse stability, the range of efficacy, and electricity consumption	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMayu Oi

Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology

mayuooi@med.kobe-u.ac.jp078-382-6172

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026