Lightwand-assisted insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a comparative study among the digital and gum elastic bougie-guided techniques.

Lightwand-assisted insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a comparative study among the digital and gum elastic bougie-guided techniques. - lightwand and ProSeal laryngeal mask airway

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000006301

Enrollment

240

Registered

2011-09-07

Start date

2011-09-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

patients undergoing elective unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy were recruited into the study

Interventions

The ProSeal laryngeal mak airway was inserted by using digital manipulation. The ProSeal laryngeal mak airway was inserted with a gum elastic bougie. The ProSeal laryngeal mak airway was inserted

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients undergoing elective unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy were recruited into the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.had a known or predicted difficult airway 2.had a mouth opening less than 2.5cm 3.had a body mass index greater than 35 4.were at risk of aspiration during induction of anesthesia 5.presence of oropharyngeal pathology that might interfere with insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mak airway

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
insertion success rate and insertion time	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
complications	—

Countries

Asia(except Japan)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026