Skip to content

Comparative Analysis of efficay and safety in eradication therapy as 3rd line, PPI+AMPC+LVFX versus high dose PPI+AMPC

Comparative Analysis of efficay and safety in eradication therapy as 3rd line, PPI+AMPC+LVFX versus high dose PPI+AMPC - Eradication therapy as 3rd line, versus high dose PPI+AMPC

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000005373
Enrollment
50
Registered
2011-04-14
Start date
2011-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with H. pylori infection who failed 2nd line of eradication therapy

Interventions

PPI AMPC LVFX HIgh dose of PPI AMPC

Sponsors

Chiba University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patinets who failed 2nd line of Hp eradication therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Allergy for PPI AMPC LVFX pregnancy nursing a baby

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The efficacy and safety in 3rd line of Hp eradication therapy

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026