Comparison between pulse fluoroscopy and conventional fluoroscopy in the ERCP related procedure

Comparison between pulse fluoroscopy and conventional fluoroscopy in the ERCP related procedure - Usefulness of pulse fluoroscopy for ERCP related procedure

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000004698

Enrollment

Registered

2011-06-01

Start date

2010-12-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

patients with pancreatobiliary disorders that have indication of ERCP related procedures

Interventions

pulse fluoroscopy group continuous (conventional) fluoroscopy group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients are more than 19 years of age, suspected pancreatobiliary disorders that have indication of ERCP related procedures, with written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The patients are not approved for ERCP related procedure because of general condition.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The primary endpoint is comparison the quality of image of pulse fluoroscopy with that of continuous fluoroscopy that affects clinical practice.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The secondary endpoint is comparison of radiation dose between two groups.	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHiroki Kawashima

Nagoya University Graduate school of Medicine Depertment of Gastroenterology

h-kawa@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp+81-52-744-2602

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026