Comparison of various sealing and cutting devices in VATS lobectomy

Comparison of various sealing and cutting devices in VATS lobectomy - Comparison of various sealing and cutting devices in VATS lobectomy

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000004643

Enrollment

120

Registered

2011-04-01

Start date

2011-02-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The disease that is necessary for lobectomy

Interventions

Vascular divided by Enseal&amp

reg

(bipolar type) Vascular divided by LigaSure&amp

(bipolar type) Vascular divided by Harmonic&amp

(supersonic wave type) Vascular divided by the ligation that we do not use a coagulotomy device

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients that it is planned lobectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: When severe adhesion is expected and there are severe complications

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The burst pressure measurement and a tissue evaluation of the divided site in the sample, duration of the postoperative pulmonary fistula, a drain custody period, quantity of drain drainage, generic postoperative blood data.	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMasayuki Toishi

Shinshu University, School of Medicine Department of Surgery

mtoi@shinshu-u.ac.jp0263-37-2657

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026