Skip to content

Effectiveness of prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis for risk group by an endoscopic pancreatic spontaneous dislodgement stent -randomized controlled multicenter trial-

Effectiveness of prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis for risk group by an endoscopic pancreatic spontaneous dislodgement stent -randomized controlled multicenter trial- - Effectiveness of prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis by pancreatic spontaneous dislodgement stent-randomized controlled multicenter trial-

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000004324
Enrollment
500
Registered
2010-10-04
Start date
2008-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effectiveness of prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis for risk group by an endoscopic pancreatic spontaneous dislodgement stent -randomized controlled multicenter trial-

Interventions

P-stent non P-stent

Sponsors

Japan Pancreatic Stent-Study Group (JPS-SG)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Risk factors were divided into two groups: a) patient-related factors and b) procedure-related factors. Patient-related factors included: 1) age < 60, female gender, 2) history of pancreatitis, and 3) suspected biliary sphincter of Oddi disorder (SOD). Procedure-related factors included: 1) pancreatography first, 2) pancreatography ≥ 2 times, 3) endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy (EPST), 4) precut, 5) endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD), 6) common bile duct (C) -tissue sampling (biopsy, brush, cytology), 7) pancreatic duct (P) -tissue sampling (biopsy, brush, cytology), 8) non-endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) + endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD), 9) non ES + endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD), 10) common bile duct intraductal ultrasonography (C-IDUS), 11) pancreatic duct-intraductal ultrasonography (P–IDUS), 12) difficulty of cannulation ( ≥ 15 minutes), and 13) procedure time ( ≥ 30 minutes ) (Figure 2).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The following cases were excluded: 1) cases who could not provide written informed consent, 2) cases deemed inappropriate for this trial (although there were none in the present study), 3) cases with a performance status of 4, 4) cases in which the duodenal papilla could not be accessed endoscopically, 5) cases requiring pancreatic duct drainage, 6) cases with a history of prior ERCP procedures, 7) cases of postgastrectomy, 8) cases requiring endoscopic papillectomy, 9) cases of pancreatic head cancer with main pancreatic duct occlusion, 10) cases of pancreas divisum (excluding such cases at the stage when diagnosed by ERCP, due to the difficulty of diagnosis before pre-ERCP), 11) cases of chronic pancreatitis, 12) cases of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), 13) cases of gallstone pancreatitis, 14) cases of pancreaticobiliary maljunction, and 15) cases in which the ERCP procedure was not completed within 1 hour from the transoral insertion of the scope.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary study endpoints were the frequency and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with risk factors. We also evaluated hyperamylasemia, the success rate of stent placement, the duration before stent dislodgment, and complications in both groups. We also evaluated risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026