Efficacy of 3D monitor in laparoscopic surgery

Efficacy of 3D monitor in laparoscopic surgery - Randomized control study of laparoscopic surgery comparison of 2D and 3D monitor

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000004239

Enrollment

120

Registered

2010-10-10

Start date

2010-10-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

prostate cancer, adrenal tumor

Interventions

2D monitor vs 3D monitor 2D monitor vs 3D monitor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy 2) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) performance status 2 and more 2) ASA (american society of anesthesiology) score 3 and more 3) BMI 30 and more Adrenal tumor 4) pheocromocytoma 5) diameter 5 cm and more

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Operation time, including the separated procedure in operation	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHidefumi Kinoshita

Kansai Medical University Department of Urology and Andrology

kinoshih@hirakata.kmu.ac.jp072-804-0101

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026