Skip to content

Comparison of the midterm patency after primary nitinol stenting for superficial femoral artery (intraluminal v.s. subintimal angioplasty assessed by intravascular ultrasound)

Comparison of the midterm patency after primary nitinol stenting for superficial femoral artery (intraluminal v.s. subintimal angioplasty assessed by intravascular ultrasound) - Super FACT registry (SUPERficial Femoral Artery Chronic Total occlusion registry)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000003205
Enrollment
82
Registered
2010-02-18
Start date
2007-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

PAD (Peripheral artery disease)

Interventions

intraluminalgroup subintimal group

Sponsors

Kansai Rosai Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Symptoms due to SFA-CTO lesion (Rutherford 2-6) that affected the quality of life in spite of excises and medications De novo SFA-CTO lesion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: angioplasty alone Restenotic lesions acute or sub-acute limb ischemia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary and Secondary patency

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026