Comparison with LMA Proseal, LMA Supreme and i-gel

Comparison with LMA Proseal, LMA Supreme and i-gel - Comparison with LMA Proseal, LMA Supreme and i-gel, at general anesthetic induction, maintenance, insertion of tracheal tube.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000002767

Enrollment

Registered

2009-11-20

Start date

2010-01-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients undergoing general anesthesia

Interventions

LMA ProSeal group LMA Supreme group i-gel group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults undergoing general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Emergency operation, pregnant, full stomach, a respiration disorder, facial disorder, laparoscopic operation, lateral and prone position.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
easiness of Insertion: a ratio of success time-dependent change: the position related to larynx tracheal intubation: a ratio of success	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The time depending on the insertion, the number of times, seal pressure, easiness of the insertion of a stomach tube, vital, performer's evaluation.	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMichiko Kinoshita

Tokushima university hospital Anesthesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026