Skip to content

Comparison of Automatic and Manual Threshold Testing

Comparison of Automatic and Manual Threshold Testing - COMET study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000001458
Enrollment
500
Registered
2008-10-28
Start date
2008-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient implanted with cardiac pacemaker

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patient who has implanted with Medtronic cardiac pacemaker (Adapta or Sensia). 2) Patient who signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patient who is not abpe to program device automatic features (i.e., ACM, VCM or Sensing Assurance). 2) Patient who is not able to visit clinic according to scheduled follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to complete device follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Measured pacing threshold.

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026