Skip to content

Effectiveness of CBT Augmentation in Major depression treatment: a randomized clinical trial

Effectiveness of CBT Augmentation in Major depression treatment: a randomized clinical trial - Effectiveness of CBT Augmentation in Major depression study (E-CAM Study)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000001218
Enrollment
80
Registered
2008-07-01
Start date
2008-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Interventions

16 weeks of cognitive behavior therapy in addition to treatment as usual 16 weeks of treatment as usual alone

Sponsors

The E-CAM Study Group
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subjects with current DSM-IV Major Depressive Disorder based on SCID-P at screening. 2. Subjects with HAMD-17 score >=16 at screening. 3. Subjects who had received 8 weeks or longer usual depression treatment for current depression episode at baseline. 4. Subjects with mild to moderate treatment resistance assessed at baseline (Mausdley Staging Method>=3). 5. Aged 20 years or older, and 65 years or younger at screening. 6. Subjects who give full consent in the participation of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.No alcohol or substance use disorder in 6 months prior to the screening. 2.No history or concurrent manic or psychotic episode. 3.No other primary DSM-IV Axis I Disorders at screening. 4.No comorbid of antisocial personality disorder. 5.No serious suicidal ideation at screening. 6.Evidence of unable to participate half or more of the intervention phase. 7.No past treatment of CBT. 8.No organic brain lesions or major cognitive deficits in a year prior to the screening. 9.No severe or unstable medical co-morbidities at screening. 10.Other relevant reason decided by the E-CAM investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) change score at 16 week from the baseline will be compared between the groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Response rate (defined as 50% reduction of baseline HAMD-17), remission rate (defined as HAMD-17=<7), subjective depression (measured with the BDI and QIDS/IDS) and quality of life (measured with EQ-5D and SF-36) at 16 week and post-intervention phase (up to 12months) will be compared between the groups. Cost effectiveness (ICER per remitted patient and ICER per QALY) will be also compared between the groups.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactAtsuo Nakagawa, M.D.,Ph.D.

Keio University School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry

anakagawa@keio.jp03-5363-3214

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026